- #Version control with subversion how to
- #Version control with subversion full
- #Version control with subversion Offline
- #Version control with subversion download
Fundamental Concepts The Repository Versioning Models The Problem of File Sharing The Lock-Modify-Unlock Solution The Copy-Modify-Merge Solution Subversion in Action Subversion Repository URLs Working Copies Revisions How Working Copies Track the Repository Mixed Revision Working Copies Updates and commits are separate Mixed revisions are normal Mixed revisions are useful Mixed revisions have limitations Summary 2. Michael Pilato What Is Subversion? Is Subversion the Right Tool? Subversion's History Subversion's Architecture Subversion's Components What's New in Subversion 1.
#Version control with subversion how to
See this link in order to take a look at how much data our dev div server currently handles across all branches in the server.Table of Contents Foreword Preface Audience How to Read This Book Conventions Used in This Book Organization of This Book This Book Is Free Acknowledgments From Ben Collins-Sussman From Brian W. TFS is likely more able to comfortably scale to larger "working copies" and larger repository sizes.I would love to know how long it would take a Subversion server to accomplish the same result.
#Version control with subversion download
As an example, a 'tf get' in my Orcas branch enlistment that contains ~1.6million items with no file content to download takes ~1-2min to complete.
TFS get is likely to be faster than Subversion sync because the TFS server knows what version of the file the client has. Now here are some things that I think are true based on what I know about how Subversion works, but might not actually be true. The mechanics are very different, however the end result is fairly similar. Both support some sort of locking system to prevent checkins or edits on certain files. (The algorithm used is different, however.) Both use a binary compression algorithm to create delta chains of files. Both know that "add foo, delete foo, add foo" are separate items, unlike CVS. Subversion supports symbolic links inside of the repository that don't create symbolic links on the file system, sync just downloads items from the destination instead. (pending, shelving, merging, undoing, and checking in) TFS also supports cyclic and dependant renames. This means that if someone renames something behind your back, and then you do a 'svn update' that your local edit (while not getting deleted) does not get renamed. Subversion doesn't have a real rename implementation. TFS currently has client-side checkin policies. Subversion has server side hook scripts. #Version control with subversion Offline
TFS currently can't perform an offline diff.Subversion is more functional when the local client can't contact the server (diff, status, etc.).TFS has shelves, and Subversion doesn't.Subversion currently only shows an items history, and does not show non-history related branches of an item.
#Version control with subversion full
TFS can show you full branch topologies (via 'tf branches'). Subversion doesn't force you to check out an item before you start editing it. I don't believe Subversion supports either of these things. This includes being able to undelete something after a parent has been renamed. TFS supports easily undeleting deleted items. (content does not get branched, just the file metadata). Branching in TFS has a variable cost based on the number of items in the subtree being branched. Branching in Subversion has a constant cost. Here are some real differences between TFS and Subversion (to the best of my understanding): Subversion doesn't come with these nice UI things. There are features like 'Explorer integration', 'Color-coded Status Icons', 'Revision Graphs' etc.
0 kommentar(er)
